« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

March 2008

March 30, 2008

Food Comes from Farms?

My interest in agricultural spans quite a few decades, including undergraduate and some graduate work in agriculture. With this background, I imagine I should be continually amazed at the public's lack of knowledge about the source of the food it consumes. I often facetiously remark, when I come across food items in markets, such as milk or beef, labeled "organic", "is there such a thing as inorganic milk or beef?". But with modern technology, and reading the labels on some junk food items, that remark may not be as facetious as it sounds.

Anyhow, notwithstanding the fact that many people have no idea where their food comes from, it may be a good idea to read the article Survey shows consumers ignorant of farmers’ role in food chain, from the Mar 28, 2008, written by David Bennett, Farm Press Editorial Staff. I found it quite interesting and, sadly, to some degree, funny. Anyway, the story is located at http://westernfarmpress.com/news/survey-farmers-0328/.  An example of a survey response: Farm animals raised for food should be treated the same way household pet owners treat their pets.Amazingly, 30 percent strongly agreed with that and 26 percent strongly disagreed.

One point of interest - with the increase in cost of many farm products, if folks want to reduce their food costs, maybe they should start growing their own produce, raise a few chickens if they have the space, and generally get back to the small "family plot".  The World War II version of this - the Victory Garden - wasn't a bad idea, since it put some power back into the hands of the people.

-30-

March 25, 2008

Changes we need

Politicians running for President of the United States of America are talking about the need for change, but so far, in my opinion, they are all missing the boat.

Here are the changes we really need:

  • one national primary, just before the nominating conventions
  • candidates have to talk about the important subjects, not the pulp mags kinds of nonsense - you know, about just how they will improve the economy, take care of national security, bring manufacturing back to this country, all those "boring" topics
  • once again, we need improvements in education - people have to not only know how to read, but have to improve their comprehension skills - depending upon so called "political pundits" for their information, without the ability to discern between reality and fable (promotion), does, in the end, give us poor choices for the job of president.
  • real news and political broadcasts - provided by commentators who at least know about that which they speak - all we seem to have now are, as Lewis Black to Larry King, "failed comics - entertainers"; the problem with that is, would audiences have the ability to understand what they were told, or, for that matter, could they watch the programming for more than a few minutes before switching to something more entertaining?
  • commentator shows - as seen on CNN, Fox, MSNBC, et al., and their ilk should at least change their "guest" panelists - the same old faces with the same old opinions, promoting the same tired old candidates. If you don't have cable or satellite, then how can you watch/hear some intelligent commentary shown on channels like CSPAN, Free Speech TV, Book Channel, etc. (note - Free Speech TV is interesting in that you hear news, stories, and opinions that are not of the mainstream - most of what I have watched has been pretty far over on the liberal socialist side of the spectrum, but it's always good to know what "the other side" is talking about).

In other words, the change we need is to become a more mature, thinking, intelligent society. I know that's a tall order, but think about this - Governor Richardson said he was supporting Senator Obama because he is a "unifier", which is what many of Obama's backers state. But what is meant by a unified country? Wars against this country (WWI, WWII) were great unifiers, where we all worked for the common good. But without that kind of uniting event, a "unified" country could only be one which is subservient to the state. Because if we are unified, then there is no room (need?) for diverse opinion. We are subjected to what the state believes is good for us, which the state will have convinced us will make us all happy. Sounds like fascism to me.

 

March 24, 2008

A last Thought Re: Obama and Wright

A last Thought Re: Obama and Wright

Notwithstanding the Senator's media acclaimed speech given in response to his Pastor Wright brouhaha, it appears that Obama had his GWB "...window of his soul" moment.

After all, the Senator is seeking the presidency of the United States of America, not of his local home owners association. If he was unable to take a strong stance against a verbal attack upon the United States of America, the country which he wishes to lead, without being prompted to do so, just because he feels that the promulgator of those ant-American remarks is "like an uncle to him", then how on earth is he ever going to defend his people against any country or organization?

Will that be the curse of a liberal socialist administration?

March 17, 2008

And Now We Know

Gospel of the New Truth - Now We Know
Flag this entry as inappropriate
Now we know - now we know why Obama's wife stated she didn't like this country until her husband ran for the Democrat Party nomination. After listening to Pastor Wright for the past twenty years, and being deeply involved with him - he marries the Obamas, baptised his children, et al., Mrs. Obama has come out as a disciple of Wright's beliefs.

So for the Senator to state that "he wasn't there" during the sermons shown in the videos on national television, is pretty disingeneous. Which all goes to bolster my contention that here's a guy you have to worry about assuming the mantle of President of the United States.

If he were truly a man of principal - a man for everyone - as he claims to be, he would have left Trinity a long time ago. Since he didn't, and is only now defending his actions because they have been made public, there's no way Obama does not go along with his Pastor's beliefs, regardless of his so-called "disavowing Wright's statements".

This is just another example of the candidate's defects.

March 14, 2008

Just an American

Senator Obama announced the other day that he is an African-American, has Hussein as a middle name, and that information didn't or doesn't make it easy for him as a politician. It didn't make it difficult, either. This split nationality b.s. is really a pain in the rear end. Obama is no more an African than I am. He was born in Honolulu, so how can he be an African-American?

And for that matter, why are all blacks called African-Americans? I imagine that there are a few blacks, and whites, who are citizens, but who were born in Africa, but what value is there to being called an African-American or any other hyphenated nationality, unless the individual truly holds dual citizenship. Look, first the blacks were Negros, then coloreds (which included all non-whites), then in the 1950s the name to be called was black – as in “Black Pride”. Apparently that wasn't good enough, so, regardless of where the person's birth occurred, the black became an “African-American”. I imagine that just being an “American” wasn't and/or isn't good enough. I'll have to start calling myself a European-American, since my family goes way back in time.

You might say that the American Indian is the only real American except that it is understood that those native to this continent may have come from either South America or from across the Bering Strait, which leaves that ethnic group out of the picture (Siberian-Russian-Tibetan-American, or what?).

Anyhow, the point of all this is that if Senator Obama wishes to be President of these United States of America, and achieves that goal, he better forget this African-American crap and just call himself an American. Otherwise, we'll really have a divided country. Millions of people have emigrated to this land, anxious and proud to become an American, not a hyphenated American.

-30-

March 11, 2008

Time to Face Reality

It appears that I was not far from the thoughts of many people when I wrote my previous blogs about Obama. Listening to some TV pundits, and reading a few columnists in today's paper, I found the same sentiments about which I had written.

So to continue in that vein, there are a couple of subjects needing remarking. The first is the dysfunctional Democrat party. Its caucus system and primary system is totally screwed up, re: awarding of delegates in both, and time allowed for voting in the former. From what I remember, the idea of proportioning delegates came from Jesse Jackson in 1980, which, as we find, was an unfortunately accepted suggestion.

The other comment is about what the primary and caucus wins for Obama really mean. Since most of his wins in both the caucuses and primaries come from exceedingly heavy support from black voters and/or independents, does that represent the majority of Democrat voters, and/or all voters in this country? Or does it represent the raising of the hue and cry from one group of ethnic voters combined with the idealism of young and very liberal voters? The two groups are not the same – one is black voters voting for a black man – the other is a group of voters who believe that life can be changed like linking to another web page. Both reasons are not sound – neither from a realistic nor pragmatic point of view.

Obama's main topics are “I was against invading Iraq”, and now, apparently, possibly the economy, though it's hard to tell. His Iraq statement is currently meaningless, because, if he should be nominated and elected, what he was against, in the safety of not being a Senator who would have had to vote on the issue (an he hasn't voted on much of anything else during his term in office), doesn't mean a diddly thing. He will need a very strong understanding and appreciation for what has to be done – of how to remove troops – which will take at least 5-6 years – in a way in which America will both save face and not be under a threat from those running Iraq.

It's really aggravating that the American people cannot be told the truth, for fear of losing elections. When Bill Clinton mentioned that if it were not for LBJ, Martin Luther King's desire for the Civil Rights Act would not have gone through Congress. That statement, as correct as it was, was considered “dissing” black Americans, who used it as an excuse to leave the Clintons and vote en masse for Obama. Mentioning that, however, brings up the charge of racism, which, of course, has Democrats cringing in fear. Truth has been the tool of the righteous, but these days, the only righteous appear to be those who deny truth.

The Democrats have an opportunity to regain the White House, but like many football teams, it's the last couple of mistaken plays that cost the game. Unless the Democrat voters understand that reality is more important that hopeful dreaming, it's liable to be a long, long road to Tipperary.

\

March 06, 2008

Still Important Words for Today

Just in case you have forgotten this most famous quote from Patrick Henry's speech to the Virginia Convention - words of equal import - and maybe more so - today as then:

"The gentlemen may cry Peace, peace! but thee is no peace. The war has actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethern are already in the field! Why stand here idle? What is it that the gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear or peace so sweet as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God. I know not what course others may take, but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"



[I would also like to recommend Eric Burns' excellent book, Virtue, Valor, and Vanity, a rare look at those who were so important to the founding of this country}


for more connections, and for security related comments


March 05, 2008

Free speech TV has it Wrong

The tag of a program I caught yesterday on Free Speech TV stated "Anti- Immigration is un-American". The network and others who believe the same should get their facts right; the argument is not over legal immigration - it's all about illegal immigration.

No one denies the fact that immigrants made this country what it is - and that's going back to the first settlers. Anti-illegal immigration is not un-American, especially in these times of social, economic,and security chaos. Sure, it is understandable that people want to come to this country for economic reasons - but if they do, let them join the club and not attempt to do so without following the membership rules.

We all should know, by this time, the cost to the country of illegal immigration.  Anti-illegal immigration? That's being pro-American. 

March 04, 2008

It's Time to be Great Again

I don't want to sound like some crusty old geezer – I'm actually a pretty upbeat guy who looks at life as a half-full glass – but I like to look at life in a practical manner. And what I have been reading, hearing, and seeing over the past six months has been pretty annoying.

It seems as though too many people in this country have forgotten what it means to be an American. Hey, it's only sixty-two plus years since the end of World War II, but if weren't for those of us who lived through those days, nobody would appreciate what this country could do.

Our national frame of mind – the American spirit as it called – was tremendous. Except for a few exceptions, we all believed that we lived in a country that could accomplish anything, and the efforts of our people – in both the civil and military sectors – proved that we could. Along with allied countries, we were able to lead and win a war against totalitarianism.

Of course, that success didn't make this country loved by everyone – oh, maybe for  a short time, but eventually, because of the effort the United States put forth and the help which it gave to both our former enemies and friendly countries, a feeling of resentment grew in Europe and the Far East. Of course, that was not unexpected, since people often resent the fact that they need assistance, and therefore resent the one providing the assistance.

But America was the strongest power in the world – in manufacturing, agriculture, education – everything countries need. Of course, as we have seen over the past few decades, that has changed somewhat. Now there seems to be a feeling that our great days are behind us, that we have to begin considering the power of Asian, Middle Easter, and Latin American countries, and understand that we will no longer be the dominant world power.

I shudder to think what would happen to us if our countries leaders followed that line of thought. We have already reached the point where we produce less and import more – seeing clothing or electronic items without a label reading made in Chine, Jordan, Taiwan, or other countries is a rare thing indeed.

Agricultural production is turning to bio-fuels, beef cattle production is down, import of grains is up – and we used to produce enough food to feed the world, as well as ourselves.

Trade agreements often work to our peoples' detriment, all in the name of maintaining a level playing field. Other countries attempt to influence our political system – not for our good – but for theirs, and too often our vox populi goes along with what those countries attempt.

Whatever happened to the pride we once took in the accomplishments of this country? There is too much talk of “nobody loves us”. Of course they don't. They are not going to love us if they fee we are too powerful, and we are certainly not going to be loved if they believe we are too weak. Besides, why do we need to be loved? The need to be loved is a sign of weakness for a political entity.

I remember being in Europe a few decades ago, where I had the distinct feeling that I knew, as an American, what the Romans must have felt when they walked they lands they captured – the power to be feared and at the same time, respected. I don't believe those same feelings would be evident today.

Reclamation of our national prestige should be a major task of our current and future country's leaders. The United States needs to reassert it's dominance – otherwise we will sure-as-shootin' end up as someplace else.

March 02, 2008

Gospel of the New Truth - Once Again....

It seems that every time I turn around, events back up what I have previously blogged.  And once again, my ire has been aroused.

Obama and the Palestinians seem to have some similar questionable ethical values; i.e., doing one thing and saying another.  For instance:
I noted some time ago that Obama totally neglected his responsibility as chair of the subcommittee on foreign affairs - when Hilary Clinton recently brought up this subject, Obama had the audacity to say that he didn't have time for that responsibility, since he was running for president.  I imagine that since he's spent almost his entire political career running for office, the most important thing to Obama is Obama.

When responding to the Clinton's charge about not rejecting Farrahhan support, Obama said "I don't see a difference between denouncing and rejecting. But if the word reject, Senator Clinton feels, is stronger than the word denounce, then I am happy to concede the point, and I would reject and denounce" the endorsement by Nation of Islam founder Louis Farrakhan, a known anti-Semite.

What a crock of bull - first of all, denouncing a statement doesn't mean you reject the support of the person or group making that statement. Secondly, Obama had to be prodded into making the so-called "rejection". As I've previously written, Obama is still a strong supporter of his church's pastor,  a strong supporter of the goals of Farrakhan.

I guess that Obama understands that you can lie to the people re: your true feelings and ideology - with the assurance (he believes) - that the  American people are stupid enough to fall for whatever they are told, if that telling is in a form which appeals to their emotions.  Goebbels found that to be a very effective device.

The Palestinians - Hamas - continue to attack Isreali cities with rocket launches, and continue to scream and cry that they are terribly mistreated when the Israelis respond - a "holocaust", said Abbas today. More B.S. from groups who insist that only they are right, and everyone else is wrong. Abbas denounced Hamas' previous attacks, but reject them? No way!

So you tell me Hamas - the Palestinians - Obama do not have the same ethical standards, especially when it comes to facing the truth.

My wife and I attended attended a great concert at UNLV last night - the Queens Coldstream Guards and the Pipes and Drums of the Royal Guards of Scotland.  One section of the performance was a tribute to the United States - music from the founding days up through WWII. It was inspiring to see the full house respond to the program in an old-fashioned patriotic way - and giving a standing round of applause to those English soldiers for their support of the USA in Afghanistan and Iraq. That was something we haven't seen much of these days, and we would be much better off if more of our citizens understood that, which to them, is "ancient history". And that applauding the stupid remarks of Michelle Obama, who doesn't believe that our country offered anything from which she could take pride until her husband started winning primary elections, is, in effect, denigrating the greatness that is America.

If Obama and his wife should be the couple occupying the White House come 2009, this country will, as many people fear,  be a place that none of will recognize, and one only the ignorant will enjoy.

For previous blogs, visit htp://thoughts.com and type gospel of the new truth into the search bar

Blog powered by TypePad